Observational studyAIDS research and therapy2025
Clinical outcomes on B/F/TAF and dolutegravir-based regimens at 12 months following regimen switch: an observational cohort study.
Observational study in AIDS research and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis retrospective observational study evaluated the clinical use and treatment outcomes in virologically suppressed people with HIV (PWH) switching to either bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF) or dolutegravir (DTG)-based regimens (single- and multi-tablet formulations (STR and MTR)).
methodsWe analyzed electronic medical and dispensing records from Trio Health HIV Research Network for treatment-experienced PWH ≥ 18 years suppressed (viral load [VL] < 200 copies/mL) at switch to B/F/TAF, DTG STR (DTG/3TC, DTG/RPV, DTG/3TC/ABC) or most common DTG MTRs with VL at 12 months (+/-3) since switch between April 2019 and December 2024. Univariate comparisons: chi-square or t-test; characteristics associated with virologic suppression at 12 months: multivariable logistic regression [LR], controlling for age, gender, race, baseline CD4 count, regimen, and adherence (proportion days covered [PDC] ≥ 80%).
resultsOf 3141 PWH, 66% switched to B/F/TAF, 27% to DTG STR, and 7% to DTG MTRs. Baseline characteristics differed significantly between groups: B/F/TAF group had a higher proportion of males (81% vs. 67% DTG MTR) and Black individuals (40% vs. 31% DTG STR), while the DTG STR and MTR groups had higher proportions of PWH with cardiovascular disease (35% and 39% respectively vs. 32% on B/F/TAF) and eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m² (18% and 22% respectively vs. 8% on B/F/TAF). At 12 months post switch, proportion of individuals with PDC ≥ 80% was higher in the DTG STR group (76%) compared to DTG MTR (67%) and B/F/TAF (69%) with similar virologic suppression across groups (98%, 98%, and 97% respectively). In multivariable LR, there was an association of White race, PDC ≥ 80%, and CD4 ≥ 200 cells/mm
conclusionsDespite differences in baseline characteristics and regimen adherence between individuals switched to B/F/TAF, DTG STRs, and MTRs, both B/F/TAF and DTG-based regimens were associated with high rates of virologic suppression. This data strongly supports the inclusion of these simple and safe regimens as switch options in virologically suppressed PWH. Baseline differences in patient demographics and characteristics may have impacted the adherence on B/F/TAF compared to DTG STR, however virologic outcomes were preserved, demonstrating the forgiveness of B/F/TAF in populations potentially facing adherence challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.