ArticleBMC nursing2025
The mediating effect of moral distress on the relationship between work environment and depression among critical care nurses.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Professional Values, Work Environment and Job Satisfaction Among Critical Care Nurses in Palestine: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study.Nursing open · 2026Article
- Self-Leadership and Caring as Foundations of Relational Accountability in Nursing Clinical Judgement: A Conceptual Analysis.Nursing open · 2026Review
- Linking Work Environment to Turnover Intention: The Mediating Role of Moral Distress Among Emergency Nurses.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026Article
- Insights Into Factors Affecting Nurses' Knowledge of and Attitudes Toward AI and Implications for Successful AI Integration in Critical Care: Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR nursing · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCritical care nurses (CCNs) frequently encounter ethical dilemmas and institutional constraints that contribute to moral distress, a phenomenon linked to adverse psychological outcomes, such as depression and increased turnover intentions. Despite growing evidence of these relationships, comprehensive studies examining the interplay between the work environment, moral distress, and depression among CCNs in Saudi Arabia remain scarce.
objectivesThis study aimed to assess the mediating role of moral distress on the relationship between the work environment and depression among CCNs.
methodsA cross-sectional design was employed, recruiting 230 critical care nurses from four tertiary hospitals in Hail, Saudi Arabia. Validated instruments—the Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index (PES-NWI), Measure of Moral Distress for Healthcare Professionals (MMD-HP), and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)—were used to measure the work environment, moral distress, and depression, respectively. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson’s correlation, and mediation analysis using Hayes’ PROCESS macro.
resultsThe means of the work environment, moral distress, and depression were 2.67 ± 0.46, 104.24 ± 76.12, and 11.57 ± 5.72, respectively. A significant weak negative correlation was found between the work environment and moral distress (r = − .323, p < .001) and between the work environment and depression (r = − .243, p < .001). Moral distress positively correlated with depression (r = .285, p < .001). Mediation analysis revealed that moral distress (β=-0.075, p = .003) serves as a partial negative mediator between work environment and depression. Nurses with lower educational attainment (diploma/associate degree) or three or more children reported higher levels of depression (p < .05).
conclusionsThis study underscores the detrimental impact of a poor work environment on moral distress and depression among CCNs. Moral distress serves as a key mediator amplifying psychological harm. Interventions targeting ethical climate improvement, mental health support, and educational advancement are urgently required to mitigate these effects. These findings advocate for systemic changes to enhance nurses’ well-being and retention, particularly in high-intensity settings, such as critical care units. Future research should employ a longitudinal design to establish causality and evaluate intervention efficacy. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.