ArticleBMC women's health2025
Management of retained products of conception in a tertiary centre: a 20-year retrospective cohort study.
Article in BMC women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy survey of hysteroscopic practice.Facts, views & vision in ObGyn · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRetained products of conception (RPOC) are defined as the persistence of trophoblastic tissue or placenta inside the uterine cavity after pregnancy. Management is challenging because there are no clearly defined diagnostic criteria, evidence-based guidelines, or treatment protocols. Our aim was to determine the success and complication rate of different methods of RPOC management at our tertiary centre in the last 20 years.
methodsWe retrospectively collected data from patients with RPOC treated in our Clinic from 2003 to 2021 in three-year intervals. The following data were obtained: age, type of RPOC, type of treatment, complications, histopathological evaluation of the acquired tissue, and the need for transfusion.
conclusionsOur study shows that hysteroscopy and D&C are highly successful methods of RPOC, however, the complication rate in D&C is significantly higher. Moreover, less invasive treatment of RPOC using expectant and medical approach is plausible, especially in asymptomatic patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.