ArticleBMC women's health2025
Comparative hysteroscopic profiles among women with primary and secondary infertility at Benjamin Mkapa hospital: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInfertility affects an estimated 48 million couples globally, with disproportionately high rates in sub-Saharan Africa. Intrauterine abnormalities are common but underdiagnosed causes of infertility, particularly in low-resource settings where advanced diagnostic tools such as hysteroscopy are underutilized. This study aimed to compare hysteroscopic findings between women with primary infertility and those with secondary infertility at Benjamin Mkapa Hospital, Tanzania.
methodsA hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted among women with infertility who underwent diagnostic hysteroscopy. Simple random sampling was used. Hysteroscopic findings were categorized via the European Society for Gynecological Endoscopy (ESGE) classification system. The data were analyzed via Stata version 18.
resultsA total of 198 women with infertility 103 (52.02%) with primary infertility and 95 (47.98%) with secondary infertility were included. Abnormal hysteroscopic findings were more prevalent in women with secondary infertility 56 (58.95%) than in those with primary infertility 28 (27.18%). The number of intrauterine adhesions was notably greater in the secondary infertility group (13.7%) than in the primary infertility group 6 (5.8%), with more severe adhesions observed. Conversely, secondary infertility was observed more often in patients with endometrial polyps (11.6%) than primary infertility was.
conclusionSecondary infertility is associated to acquired intrauterine pathology, particularly adhesions, which are likely to result from infections or trauma. Routine diagnostic hysteroscopy should be integrated into infertility workups to increase diagnostic accuracy and guide appropriate treatment, especially in resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.