ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025
Interpretable machine learning model for low bone density screening in older adults using demographic and anthropometric data: findings from 2005 to 2020 NHANES.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRising osteoporosis from low bone mineral density (BMD) due to an aging population presents a major health challenge. Timely risk identification is vital for prevention. Traditional Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) diagnostics are expensive and inaccessible to all. This study aimed to create a machine learning (ML) model for low BMD screening using readily available demographic and anthropometric data.
methodsWe analyzed the National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005–2020 data of adults over 50, extracting demographic and anthropometric features. BMD was assessed via DXA, with low BMD defined as T-scores ≤ -1. We trained four ML algorithms—Logistic Regression (LR), Support Vector Machine with a linear kernel (SVM), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Categorical Boosting (CatBoost)—on this data, evaluating model performance using the area under the ROC curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, and F1-score, and used SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis to identify key features.
resultsA total of 13,133 participants were included in our study, with an average age of 64.88 years and a higher prevalence in males (52.2%) and Non-Hispanic Whites (46.9%). There were 7,209 individuals defined as low BMD (54.9%). Among the algorithms used, the CatBoost model showed the highest performance with an AUC of 0.840 in the training set and 0.822 in the testing set, accuracy of 0.757 and 0.751, sensitivity of 0.801 and 0.775, specificity of 0.703 and 0.720, precision of 0.765 and 0.782, and F1-score of 0.783 and 0.779, respectively. The CatBoost model identified weight, gender, age, waist circumference, and ethnicity as the top five most significant predictors of low BMD.
conclusionThe CatBoost model offers a hopeful method for early low BMD screening using accessible demographic and anthropometric data. Further validation in various populations and consideration of extra variables to boost performance are required. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.