ArticleBMC oral health2025
An epidemiological study of extracted mandibular premolars from adolescent patients in Damascus using two classification system analyzed with CBCT and digital periapical radiographs.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative performance of the ahmed and vertucci systems in classifying mandibular premolar canal morphology: a Bayesian and information-theoretic analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Detecting Residual Root Canal Filling Material After Retreatment: Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Digital Microscopy Compared with Microcomputed Tomography.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to assess the root number, length, and root canal morphology of extracted mandibular premolars (MPs) from adolescents in Damascus using two classification systems: Vertucci's classification and Ahmed's classification. This was conducted through radiographic examination utilizing Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and digital dental radiography analysis. Additionally, the study sought to investigate the correlation between these variables and gender within the sample. MATERIALS AND
methodsImmediately after extraction, the root number and maximum length were recorded. Each MP was then radiographed in buccolingual and mesiodistal directions using digital periapical radiographs. Subsequently, MPs were scanned using a CBCT device (200 μm voxel size) and the root canal morphology was classified based on Vertucci's classification and Ahmad's classification based on both radiographs. Moreover, the presence of C-shaped canals was investigated and classified according to the Fan et al. classification. Finally, the previous findings were correlated with the patient's gender, and statistical analysis was performed using the Chi-Square test and T-test in the SPSS program. The confidence interval used for the Chi-square test was 95%. Moreover, the sensitivity, accuracy, specificity, and overall agreement tests was performed to compare digital sensor radiographs with the gold standard CBCT radiographs.
resultsThe sample included 255 first MPs and 163 s MPs. No significant differences were found between males and females regarding the frequency of one, two, or three roots in the first and second MPs (p = 0.931 and p = 0.010, respectively). Most MPs had a single root. The mean length of the first MP was 21.9 mm, and the second MP was 21 mm, with males generally having longer MPs than females (p < 0.001). There were no significant gender differences in the distribution of first and second MPs according to Vertucci and Ahmed classifications (p > 0.05). Type I (
conclusionIt can be concluded that variations in root number and canal classifications are evident in MPs. Although gender does not influence the root number or canal morphology, males tend to have longer MPs. Moreover, it is noteworthy that digital sensors performed better in detecting small accessory canals in the apical third.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.