Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41013441›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2025

Person-centered shared decision-making in district nursing care on interventions to support independence in older adults with multiple chronic conditions: a video observation study.

Sigrid Wulfse-Huisman, Dorien Oostra, Jessica Veldhuizen, Nienke Bleijenberg, Bianca Buurman-van Es, Ruth Pel-Littel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sigrid Wulfse-HuismanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of Geriatrics and Amsterdam Public Health, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, The Netherlands. s.m.c.l.huisman@amsterdamumc.nl.
Dorien OostraDepartment of Health and Vitality, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Kapittelweg 33, Nijmegen, 6525 EN, The Netherlands.
Jessica VeldhuizenResearch Centre for Healthy and Sustainable Living, Faculty of Health Care, University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, Postbus 12011, Utrecht, 3501 AA, The Netherlands.
Nienke BleijenbergResearch Centre for Healthy and Sustainable Living, Faculty of Health Care, University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, Postbus 12011, Utrecht, 3501 AA, The Netherlands.
Bianca Buurman-van EsDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of Geriatrics and Amsterdam Public Health, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, The Netherlands.
Ruth Pel-LittelDepartment of Health and Vitality, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Kapittelweg 33, Nijmegen, 6525 EN, The Netherlands.

Funding

ZonMw 10040022010003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOlder adults with multiple chronic conditions often have care needs who are complex, diverse, and intertwined with personal values and goals for independent functioning. Healthcare professionals achieve person-centered decision-making by aligning interventions with prioritized personal and care-related goals. Within the context of district nursing care (home-based nursing care), person-centered shared decision-making plays a critical role in supporting older adults to maintain their independence. However, there is limited insight into how person-centered shared decision-making about interventions to support independence is applied in district nursing practice.

objectiveThis study explored how district nurses engage in person-centered shared decision-making with older adults with multiple chronic conditions during discussions about interventions to support independent functioning at home. It examined how verbal and non-verbal communication contributes to the decision-making process and how these practices align with existing person-centered shared decision-making models.

methodsA non-participatory video observation design was used. Sixteen video recordings of intakes and care evaluations were collected across four district nursing organizations in the Netherlands. Verbal communication was reported using the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist, while non-verbal communication was analyzed using the guideline of Systematic Coding of Observed human Behaviour.

resultsAnalysis of verbal and non-verbal communication showed that district nurses appeared friendly, interested, and encouraged older adults to speak. In addition, verbal communication analysis revealed that independent functioning was not assessed or decided upon in a structured, goal-oriented way. Independence was mainly discussed when raised by older adults or related to the referrer’s care request. Eight verbal communication themes emerged: being informed at start of the conversation; initiating the conversation; exploring care needs; demonstrating attentiveness to the older adult; identifying care problems and care goals; presenting and discussing options; agreeing on district nursing care, and concluding the conversation.

conclusionA person-centered shared decision-making model is crucial in district nursing care to support informed and collaborative decisions about interventions that promote independent functioning in older adults with multiple chronic conditions. This model should include preparatory and introductory phases, emphasize trust-building, and be co-developed with both district nurses and older adults. Effective implementation requires integration into professional education and training, as well as the development of a holistic geriatric assessment framework and communication skills training tailored to the context of district nursing care.

trial registrationNot applicable for this study.

Indexed as

District nursing careHome careHome-dwelling older adultsMultiple chronic conditionsPerson-centered shared decision-makingSupporting independent functioning

Identifiers

PMID41013441
PMCPMC12465545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.