ArticleBMC oral health2025
CBCT radiomic features-based machine learning prediction models and nomogram for treatment decision-making regarding surgery-first approach in skeletal Class III malocclusion.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study aims to develop and validate a predictive nomogram and a deep learning model to determine the treatment modality of orthodontic-first approach (OFA) or surgery-first approach (SFA) for patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion using CBCT images.
methodsA nomogram was developed using CBCT images from 313 skeletal Class III patients (191 OFA vs. 122 SFA), through univariable and multivariable analyses to identify key predictors for SFA selection. Predictive accuracy was assessed using ROC analysis. CBCT images were split into training and validation sets for 5-fold cross-validation, and various deep learning models (Simple-CNN, DenseNet121, MobileNetV2, EfficientNet-B0, ResNet10, and SEResNet50) were applied to classify OFA vs. SFA.
resultsKey predictors for the nomogram included maxillary crowding, maxillary arch form asymmetry index (AI), mandibular AI, and U1-SN angle. The nomogram showed calibration with an AUC of 0.995. The Simple-CNN model achieved the best performance with sensitivity of 0.979, specificity of 0.800, precision of 0.960, accuracy of 0.909, F1-score of, 0.969 and AUC of 0.896.
conclusionsThis study introduces a nomogram for predicting SFA selection in skeletal Class III malocclusion patients and demonstrates the effectiveness of the Simple-CNN model for automated classification of treatment approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.