Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41013411›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2025

Blood culture positive sepsis in England, 2017-2018: epidemiological assessment of the commissioning for quality and innovation (CQUIN) sepsis indicator.

Ranya Mulchandani, Simon Packer, Joshua Howkins, Carla Robinson, Theresa Lamagni, Alex Bhattacharya, Rosy Reynolds, Andre Charlett, Colin Brown, Russell Hope and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Risk factors associated with apyrexia during bacteraemia: a prospective multicenter cohort study.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ranya MulchandaniUK Health Security Agency, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5157-1060
Simon PackerUK Health Security Agency, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9157-3650
Joshua HowkinsUK Health Security Agency, London, UK. josh.howkins@ukhsa.gov.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4289-2946
Carla RobinsonUK Health Security Agency, London, UK.
Theresa LamagniUK Health Security Agency, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3965-8323
Alex BhattacharyaUK Health Security Agency, London, UK.
Rosy ReynoldsNational Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Protection Research Unit (HPRU) in Behavioural Science and Evaluation, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4643-9556
Andre CharlettUK Health Security Agency, London, UK.
Colin BrownUK Health Security Agency, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4776-3403
Russell HopeUK Health Security Agency, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2838-6833
Susan HopkinsUK Health Security Agency, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5179-5702
Isabel OliverUK Health Security Agency, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6106-1734

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research ACF-2022-13-013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSepsis remains a significant clinical and public health concern, necessitating timely identification and targeted management for improved patient outcomes. This study describes the epidemiology of sepsis in emergency department attendees across England by analysing a unique multi-site linked dataset to inform approaches to strengthen surveillance and improve our understanding of clinical outcomes.

methodsAn existent study dataset was utilised comprising a sample of paediatric and adult emergency department admissions screened for community-onset sepsis in the Commissioning for Quality and Innovation (CQUIN) program in the 2017/18 financial year linked to Hospital Episode Statistics and Office for National Statistics death registrations. This dataset was linked to the United Kingdom Health Security Agency's Second-Generation Surveillance System for microbiological data. Descriptive analyses were conducted to characterise sepsis screen positives and negatives in CQUIN, including demographic characteristics, clinical presentations, microbiological profiles, and clinical outcomes.

resultsOf the 4,027 sepsis-screened emergency admissions included, 2,454 (60.9%) were sepsis screen positive under the CQUIN indicator. Only 11.2% (453/4,027) had a positive blood culture within 2 days of hospital admission. Blood culture positivity rates were 15.2% (373/2,454) and 5.1% (80/1,573) for sepsis screen positive and negative in CQUIN, respectively. Monomicrobial episodes predominated (86.5%), with Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus species being the most commonly isolated bacteria. The study showed a case fatality rate of 17.1% (420/2,454) for sepsis screen positive in CQUIN but revealed no significant difference in all-cause 30-day mortality between sepsis screen positives in CQUIN with and without positive blood cultures. Sepsis screen positives in CQUIN with a focal site of infection code were more likely to have positive blood cultures, except for respiratory infections.

conclusionsThis study provides novel insights into the epidemiology of sepsis screening in emergency departments across England, highlighting variability in blood culture positivity rates and microbial profiles. The findings underscore the importance of enhanced surveillance strategies, optimised screening protocols, tailored antimicrobial stewardship practices, and quality improvement initiatives to optimise sepsis management and outcomes. Systemic approaches are needed to address knowledge gaps and inform evidence-based interventions for sepsis care.

Indexed as

Blood CultureSepsisAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolEmergency Service, HospitalEnglandFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMiddle AgedBacteraemiaBlood cultureCQUINSepsisSurveillance

Identifiers

PMID41013411
PMCPMC12465823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.