SynthesisBMC gastroenterology2025
Chemerin as a biomarker of inflammatory bowel diseases: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mesenteric adipose tissue: from protective gatekeeper to driver of inflammatory bowel disease.Immunometabolism (Cobham, Surrey) · 2026Review
- Chemerin and the Gut: From Inflammation to Cancer.Biomedicines · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeChemerin, an adipokine involved in immune regulation and inflammation, has been implicated in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). However, existing studies have reported inconsistent findings regarding its diagnostic value. This meta-analysis aimed to clarify the association between blood chemerin levels and IBD.
methodsA systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Wanfang, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) up to February 10, 2024. Observational studies comparing blood chemerin levels between IBD patients and healthy controls, or between active and non-active IBD, were included. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using a random-effects model by incorporating the possible influence of the heterogeneity.
resultsTen case-control studies with 18 datasets involving 799 CD patients, 520 UC patients, 609 healthy controls, were included. Compared with healthy controls, IBD patients had significantly higher blood chemerin levels (SMD: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.46–0.76, p < 0.001; I² = 48%). This association remained consistent across subgroups by disease type, study quality score, study region, and BMI matching (p for subgroup difference all > 0.05). Furthermore, chemerin levels were higher in active versus non-active IBD patients (SMD: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.15–0.57, p < 0.001; I² = 38%), with robust findings across subgroup and sensitivity analyses. No significant publication bias was detected.
conclusionsElevated blood chemerin levels are associated with both the presence and activity of IBD, supporting its potential role as a non-invasive biomarker for disease diagnosis and monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.