Observational studyBMC nephrology2025
Thrombotic microangiopathy multidisciplinary assessment team: demographics, final diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes.
Observational study in BMC nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
RATIONALE &
objectiveThrombotic Microangiopathies (TMAs) include an etiological diverse group of phenotypically similar disorders. While individually rare, they are seen as an aggregate with regularity. Prior reports suggested the importance of approaching TMAs in a multidisciplinary fashion. We present the development and data over a 4-year period after establishing the University of California Irvine (UCI) TMA team. DESIGN, SETTINGS, PARTICIPANTS, AND MEASUREMENTS: This is a single-center retrospective case observational study of 101 diverse patients demonstrating demographics, diagnoses, triggers, treatments applied, and outcomes representing a wide range of hematologic pathologies.
findingsOf the 101 patients, 47 were females with an age range between 18 and 83 years old. 46 of our 101 patients were diagnosed with TMA. 24 patients were diagnosed with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS). Eight patients were diagnosed with Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant TMA (HSCT-TMA). Of the 24 aHUS patients, 16 were treated and 8 were evaluated for complement blockade. Of those treated, 100% demonstrated a hematologic response, 81.3% had initial renal remission and 68.8% of those who were on dialysis (11 of 16) remain off dialysis. Of the 8 HSCT-TMA patients, 5 were treated and 3 were evaluated for complement blockade. Of those treated, 80% demonstrated a hematologic response, 100% had initial renal remission; however, of all treated patients eventually returned to needing dialysis. LIMITATIONS AND
conclusionsThis observational study highlights the importance of the TMA multidisciplinary team to improve diagnosis and optimize outcomes of this rare condition. Future research is needed to subdivide response to various TMA to current and emerging therapies in the context of multidisciplinary care. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.