ArticleBMC infectious diseases2025
Association between neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and latent tuberculosis infection in the United States: a cross-sectional study from NHANES 2011-2012.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLatent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) breeds community-wide tuberculosis (TB). Early detection is the key to TB control. A novel inflammatory measure, the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), may be essential in this regard. However, the relationship between NLR and LTBI remains uncertain. This study aimed to investigate the association between neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI).
methodsThis cross-sectional study utilized data from the United States National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) conducted in 2011-2012. Curve fitting was performed to examine the association between the NLR and LTBI. Logistic regression analysis was applied to further elucidate this relationship. In addition, stratified analyses were conducted considering various blood indicators, clinicodemographic characteristics, and other relevant variables to account for potential confounders.
resultsA total of 2,609 subjects were included, in which the prevalence of LTBI was 17.44% (455/2,609). Multivariate regression modeling showed that after trichotomizing for the NLR and adjusting for all covariates, the association between the NLR and LTBI in the T3 group compared with the T1 and T2 groups reached 1.79 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.36 to 2.37, p < 0.001) and 1.47 (95% CI: 1.11 to 1.96, p < 0.001), respectively. In subgroup analyses, the effect size of NLR in the presence of LTBI in subgroups was robust.
conclusionIn patients with LTBI, the NLR was negatively associated with LTBI. Assessment of NLR may be a valuable part of prevention and diagnosis in patients with LTBI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.