ArticleBMC primary care2025
Perceived barriers and facilitators to implementing a weight management programme in a primary care setting in Singapore: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Developing implementation strategies for a community-based digital weight management program: A hybrid deductive-inductive thematic analysis grounded in implementation theory.International journal of nursing sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundObesity, a growing problem worldwide and locally, is a risk factor for many chronic conditions. Weight loss has been shown to improve health outcomes and weight management programmes are effective in achieving weight loss. However, the effectiveness and sustainability of weight management programmes are variable. The six-month, seven-touch-point Weight Management Programme (WeightWise) is a locally developed multidisciplinary programme based on the latest evidence and expert opinion. This study aimed to explore the perceived barriers and facilitators to delivering WeightWise prior to its implementation in the Singapore public primary care setting (polyclinics).
methodsBetween September 2023 and January 2024, a qualitative study was conducted across two polyclinics designated to pilot WeightWise. Twenty-six healthcare practitioners, including clinic directors, doctors, nurses, dietitians and physiotherapists, who would be involved in running WeightWise or referring patients to WeightWise, were interviewed by the researchers using an interview guide, in either a focus group or individually. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, checked and analysed thematically using the NVivo software.
resultsThe participants in this study expressed a gap in weight management in primary care and found WeightWise relevant and timely. However, they highlighted potential barriers to implementing WeightWise in terms of patient enrolment and programme delivery. For enrolment to WeightWise, the participants were concerned about a lack of prioritisation by the practitioners on weight management, time constraint, complex referral criteria and pricing. However, they highlighted potential facilitators to enrolment including targeting young and motivated patients, as well as identifying eligible patients at pre-consult vitals measurement stations. For WeightWise delivery, the perceived barriers were: increased workload for nurses, difficulty in accessing information on community exercise programmes, lack of weight management knowledge amongst practitioners, inconvenient programme timings and uncertainty in long-term benefits of WeightWise. The perceived facilitators to delivering WeightWise were: the use of remote care modalities, preventive care awareness through Healthier SG (a national health initiative), training programmes for practitioners and continuous peer support for patients.
conclusionThis study identified the need to focus on both enrolment and delivery when implementing WeightWise. It also identified low prioritisation of weight management, lack of practitioner knowledge, lack of resources and costs as key barriers when implementing a weight management programme. Tailored healthcare professionals training, additional resources and cost analysis is recommended before its implementation. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.