ArticleBMC anesthesiology2025
Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of anesthesiologists toward enhanced recovery after surgery and day surgery anesthesia management.
Article in BMC anesthesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating the feasibility and safety of 48-h short-stay pathway for robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis.International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
- Knowledge and Awareness of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocols Among Anesthesiologists: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Survey.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAs enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols evolve and become increasingly important in anesthesia management, anesthesiologists must update and improve their knowledge and skills. To investigate knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) of anesthesiologists towards ERAS and day surgery anesthesia management.
methodsThis cross-sectional study was conducted among anesthesiologists from tertiary hospitals of China, using a self-designed questionnaire.
results303 valid questionnaires [aged 37.61 ± 8.77 years, 155 (51.16%) males] were collected. The mean KAP scores were 21.04 ± 6.03 (possible range: 0-32), 31.59 ± 3.14 (possible range: 8-40), and 19.68 ± 4.09 (possible range: 6-30), respectively. Structural equation modeling showed that surgical cases (β = 0.53, P = 0.017) and ERAS-related training (β = 5.22, P = 0) directly affected knowledge. Further, knowledge (β = 0.16, P = 0) and hospital grade (β = 0.81, P = 0.044) directly affected attitude. Moreover, knowledge (β = 0.28, P = 0), attitude (β = 0.21, P = 0), gender (β = -0.96, P = 0.005), ERAS-related training (β = 2.05, P = 0), hospital grade (β = 0.89, P = 0.027), and surgical cases (β = 0.28, P = 0.025) directly affected practice.
conclusionAnesthesiologists demonstrated insufficient knowledge, positive attitude, and inactive practice towards ERAS and day surgery anesthesia management. It is recommended that efforts be made to enhance anesthesiologists' knowledge and foster proactive practice in the domains of ERAS and day surgery anesthesia management. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.