Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41013208›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of emergency medicine2025

S-100B in acute ischemic stroke: a visualization of global hotspots.

Samhitha Gurijala, Sofia Malik, Latha Ganti

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Samhitha GurijalaProsper HS, Prosper, TX, USA.
Sofia MalikWashington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Latha GantiWarren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 222 Richmond St, Providence, RI, 02903, USA. ganti@brown.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A bibliometric analysis was performed on academic research from 1965 to 2025 with a focus on S-100B protein and acute ischemic stroke (AIS). In total 15,792 academic papers about S-100B protein and AIS were reviewed, showing a sharp incline in publications after 1980. Leading the publications of research and citations were the United States, followed by Japan and Germany, which also had the highest clustered connections as well. The most prevalent organization was the Harvard University. This bibliometric analysis aims to analyze the prognostic value of S-100B protein as a potential biomarker in AIS with global data.

Indexed as

Acute ischemic strokeBibliometric analysisBiomarkersS-100B

Identifiers

PMID41013208
PMCPMC12465863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.