ArticleMolecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.)2025
Immunogenicity and memory B-cell potency induced by an inactivated COVID-19 vaccine in pregnant women.
Article in Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
During pregnancy, profound immunological, hormonal, and metabolic adaptations occur to support fetal development. The impact of pregnancy on vaccine-induced immunity remains incompletely characterized, as previous studies have primarily focused on serological antibody levels but not immune memory. Immune memory is critical for vaccine effectiveness, but effect of pregnancy on immune memory remain unknown. In addition, the memory B cell response profile induced by inactivated coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines in pregnant women remains unclear. This study comprehensively investigated the serological responses and memory B cell response induced by an inactivated COVID-19 vaccine in pregnant women. The results demonstrated that while pregnant women and non-pregnant women of childbearing age showed comparable serological antibody levels, vaccine-induced monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) from pregnant women exhibited significantly lower binding potency to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spike protein and its segments and weaker neutralizing potency and breadth than those from non-pregnant women. Vaccine-induced mAbs from pregnant women were derived predominantly from IGHV3-30, whereas those from non-pregnant women were derived diverse germline genes. Most of mAbs from pregnant women targeted the receptor-binding domain (RBD) (40.9%) and S2 domain (31.8%), whereas most of mAbs from non-pregnant women targeted the RBD (51.3%) and N-terminal domain (30.8%). These findings suggested that pregnancy may impair the potency of vaccine-induced memory B cells. These insights may be valuable for the development of vaccination strategies for pregnant women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.