ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Lamb Wave-Based Damage Fusion Detection of Composite Laminate Panels Using Distance Analysis and Evidence Theory.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Lamb wave-based damage detection method shows great potential for composite impact failure assessments. However, the traditional single signal feature-based methods only depend on partial structural state monitoring information, without considering the inconsistency of damage sensitivity and detection capability for different signal features. Therefore, this paper proposes a damage fusion detection method based on distance analysis and evidence theory for composite laminate panels. Firstly, the signal features of different dimensions are extracted from time-frequency domain perspectives. Correlational analysis and cluster analysis are applied to achieve feature reduction and retain highly sensitive signal features. Secondly, the damage detection results of highly sensitive features and the corresponding basic probability assignments (BPAs) are acquired using distance analysis. Finally, the consistent damage detection result can be acquired by applying evidence theory to the decision level to fuse detection results for highly sensitive signal features. Impact tests on ten composite laminate panels are implemented to validate the proposed fusion detection method. The results show that the proposed method can accurately identify the delamination damage with different locations and different areas. In addition, the classification accuracy is above 85%, the false alarm rate is below 25% and the missing alarm rate is below 15%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.