ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Comparative Performance Analysis of Lightweight Cryptographic Algorithms on Resource-Constrained IoT Platforms.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Text encryption using Sosemanuk and Harris Hawks optimization by laser communication.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The increase in Internet of Things (IoT) devices has introduced significant security challenges, primarily due to their inherent constraints in computational power, memory, and energy. This study provides a comparative performance analysis of selected modern cryptographic algorithms on a resource-constrained IoT platform, the Nordic Thingy:53. We evaluated a set of ciphers including the NIST lightweight standard ASCON, eSTREAM finalists Salsa20, Rabbit, Sosemanuk, HC-256, and the extended-nonce variant XChaCha20. Using a dual test-bench methodology, we measured energy consumption and performance under two distinct scenarios: a low-data-rate Bluetooth mesh network and a high-throughput bulk data transfer. The results reveal significant performance variations among the algorithms. In high-throughput tests, ciphers like XChaCha20, Salsa20, and ASCON32 demonstrated superior speed, while HC-256 proved impractically slow for large payloads. The Bluetooth mesh experiments quantified the direct relationship between network activity and power draw, underscoring the critical impact of cryptographic choice on battery life. These findings offer an empirical basis for selecting appropriate cryptographic solutions that balance security, energy efficiency, and performance requirements for real-world IoT applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.