Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41013115›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Image Processing Algorithms Analysis for Roadside Wild Animal Detection.

Mindaugas Knyva, Darius Gailius, Šarūnas Kilius, Aistė Kukanauskaitė, Pranas Kuzas, Gintautas Balčiūnas, Asta Meškuotienė, Justina Dobilienė

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Perimeter Security Utilizing Thermal Object Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mindaugas KnyvaDepartment of Electronics Engineering, Kaunas University of Technology, Studentu Str. 50-457, 51368 Kaunas, Lithuania.
Darius GailiusMetrology Institute, Kaunas University of Technology, Studentu Str. 50-454, 51368 Kaunas, Lithuania.
Šarūnas KiliusDepartment of Electronics Engineering, Kaunas University of Technology, Studentu Str. 50-457, 51368 Kaunas, Lithuania.
Aistė KukanauskaitėDepartment of Electronics Engineering, Kaunas University of Technology, Studentu Str. 50-457, 51368 Kaunas, Lithuania.
Pranas KuzasDepartment of Electronics Engineering, Kaunas University of Technology, Studentu Str. 50-457, 51368 Kaunas, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0002-9222-8285
Gintautas BalčiūnasMetrology Institute, Kaunas University of Technology, Studentu Str. 50-454, 51368 Kaunas, Lithuania.
Asta MeškuotienėMetrology Institute, Kaunas University of Technology, Studentu Str. 50-454, 51368 Kaunas, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0002-0044-7035
Justina DobilienėMetrology Institute, Kaunas University of Technology, Studentu Str. 50-454, 51368 Kaunas, Lithuania.ORCID 0009-0002-1723-4631

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study presents a comparative analysis of five distinct image processing methodologies for roadside wild animal detection using thermal imagery, aiming to identify an optimal approach for embedded system implementation to mitigate wildlife-vehicle collisions. The evaluated techniques included the following: bilateral filtering followed by thresholding and SIFT feature matching; Gaussian filtering combined with Canny edge detection and contour analysis; color quantization via the nearest average algorithm followed by contour identification; motion detection based on absolute inter-frame differencing, object dilation, thresholding, and contour comparison; and animal detection based on a YOLOv8n neural network. These algorithms were applied to sequential thermal images captured by a custom roadside surveillance system incorporating a thermal camera and a Raspberry Pi processing unit. Performance evaluation utilized a dataset of consecutive frames, assessing average execution time, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. The results revealed performance trade-offs: the motion detection method achieved the highest sensitivity (92.31%) and overall accuracy (87.50%), critical for minimizing missed detections, despite exhibiting the near lowest specificity (66.67%) and a moderate execution time (0.126 s) compared to the fastest bilateral filter approach (0.093 s) and the high-specificity Canny edge method (90.00%). Consequently, considering the paramount importance of detection reliability (sensitivity and accuracy) in this application, the motion-based methodology was selected for further development and implementation within the target embedded system framework. Subsequent testing on diverse datasets validated its general robustness while highlighting potential performance variations depending on dataset characteristics, particularly the duration of animal presence within the monitored frame.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnimals, WildImage Processing, Computer-AssistedAnimalsColorData VisualizationNeural Networks, ComputerNormal Distributionembedded systemsimage processing algorithmsmotion detectionroadside surveillancethermal imagingwild animal detection

Identifiers

PMID41013115
PMCPMC12473846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.