Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41013114›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Toward Autonomous UAV Swarm Navigation: A Review of Trajectory Design Paradigms.

Kaleem Arshid, Ali Krayani, Lucio Marcenaro, David Martin Gomez, Carlo Regazzoni

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Velocity-Aided Navigation in GNSS-Denied Environments.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kaleem ArshidDepartment of Engineering and Naval Architecture (DITEN), University of Genoa, 16145 Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9071-360X
Ali KrayaniDepartment of Engineering and Naval Architecture (DITEN), University of Genoa, 16145 Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6598-2805
Lucio MarcenaroDepartment of Engineering and Naval Architecture (DITEN), University of Genoa, 16145 Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1515-120X
David Martin GomezIntelligent Systems Lab (LSI), Department of Systems Engineering and Automation, Carlos III University of Madrid, 28911 Leganés, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3764-5083
Carlo RegazzoniDepartment of Engineering and Naval Architecture (DITEN), University of Genoa, 16145 Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6617-1417

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of efficient and reliable trajectory-planning strategies for swarms of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) is an increasingly important area of research, with applications in surveillance, search and rescue, smart agriculture, defence operations, and communication networks. This article provides a comprehensive and critical review of the various techniques available for UAV swarm trajectory planning, which can be broadly categorised into three main groups: traditional algorithms, biologically inspired metaheuristics, and modern artificial intelligence (AI)-based methods. The study examines cutting-edge research, comparing key aspects of trajectory planning, including computational efficiency, scalability, inter-UAV coordination, energy consumption, and robustness in uncertain environments. The strengths and weaknesses of these algorithms are discussed in detail, particularly in the context of collision avoidance, adaptive decision making, and the balance between centralised and decentralised control. Additionally, the review highlights hybrid frameworks that combine the global optimisation power of bio-inspired algorithms with the real-time adaptability of AI-based approaches, aiming to achieve an effective exploration-exploitation trade-off in multi-agent environments. Lastly, the article addresses the major challenges in UAV swarm trajectory planning, including multidimensional trajectory spaces, nonlinear dynamics, and real-time adaptation. It also identifies promising directions for future research. This study serves as a valuable resource for researchers, engineers, and system designers working to develop UAV swarms for real-world, integrated, intelligent, and autonomous missions.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebio-inspired algorithmscollision avoidanceMTSPmulti-agent systemsswarm roboticstrajectory planningUAV swarmunmanned aerial vehicles

Identifiers

PMID41013114
PMCPMC12473296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.