Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41013107›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Development and Evaluation of a Novel IoT Testbed for Enhancing Security with Machine Learning-Based Threat Detection.

Waleed Farag, Xin-Wen Wu, Soundararajan Ezekiel, Drew Rado, Jaylee Lassinger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Waleed FaragDepartment of Mathematical and Computer Sciences, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Indiana, PA 15705, USA.
Xin-Wen WuDepartment of Computer Science, University of Mary Washington, Fredericksburg, VA 22401, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2548-9271
Soundararajan EzekielDepartment of Mathematical and Computer Sciences, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Indiana, PA 15705, USA.
Drew RadoDepartment of Mathematical and Computer Sciences, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Indiana, PA 15705, USA.
Jaylee LassingerDepartment of Mathematical and Computer Sciences, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Indiana, PA 15705, USA.

Funding

National Security Agency H98230-20-1-0296; H98230-22-1-0315
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Internet of Things (IoT) has revolutionized industries by enabling seamless data exchange between billions of connected devices. However, the rapid proliferation of IoT devices has introduced significant security challenges, as many of these devices lack robust protection against cyber threats such as data breaches and denial-of-service attacks. Addressing these vulnerabilities is critical to maintaining the integrity and trust of IoT ecosystems. Traditional cybersecurity solutions often fail in dynamic, heterogeneous IoT environments due to device diversity, limited computational resources, and inconsistent communication protocols, which hinder the deployment of uniform and scalable security mechanisms. Moreover, there is a notable lack of realistic, high-quality datasets for training and evaluating machine learning (ML) models for IoT security, limiting their effectiveness in detecting complex and evolving threats. This paper presents the development and implementation of a novel physical smart office/home testbed designed to evaluate ML algorithms for detecting and mitigating IoT security vulnerabilities. The testbed replicates a real-world office environment, integrating a variety of IoT devices, such as different types of sensors, cameras, smart plugs, and workstations, within a network generating authentic traffic patterns. By simulating diverse attack scenarios including unauthorized access and network intrusions, the testbed provides a controlled platform to train, test, and validate ML-based anomaly detection systems. Experimental results show that the XGBoost model achieved a balanced accuracy of up to 99.977% on testbed-generated data, comparable to 99.985% on the benchmark IoT-23 dataset. Notably, the SVM model achieved up to 96.71% accuracy using our testbed data, outperforming its results on IoT-23, which peaked at 94.572%. The findings demonstrate the testbed's effectiveness in enabling realistic security evaluations and ability to generate real-world datasets, highlighting its potential as a valuable tool for advancing IoT security research. This work contributes to the development of more resilient and adaptive security frameworks, offering valuable insights for safeguarding critical IoT infrastructures against evolving threats.

Indexed as

anomaly detectioninternet of thingsmachine learningport scanningtestbed developmentthreat detection

Identifiers

PMID41013107
PMCPMC12473166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.