SynthesisSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
A Systematic Review of Techniques for Artifact Detection and Artifact Category Identification in Electroencephalography from Wearable Devices.
Synthesis in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- High-Reliability Signal Quality Validation for Biosignals Using Sensor Fusion and Software Indices.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Assessing the Resilience of sEMG Classifiers to Sensor Malfunction and Signal Saturation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A Cloud-Aware Scalable Architecture for Distributed Edge-Enabled BCI Biosensor System.Biosensors · 2026Article
- Deception Detection from Five-Channel Wearable EEG on LieWaves: A Reproducible Baseline for Subject-Dependent and Subject-Independent Evaluation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Improved SSVEP Classification Through EEG Artifact Reduction Using Auxiliary Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Development of a Measurement Procedure for Emotional States Detection Based on Single-Channel Ear-EEG: A Proof-of-Concept Study.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Reliability of EEG in brain death diagnosis: an analysis of clinical and technical factors.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Quantitative electroencephalography as a next-generation tool in neurodiagnostics: significance, clinical applications, and practical interpretative frameworks.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
- Beyond the lab: real-world benchmarking of wearable EEGs for passive brain-computer interfaces.Brain informatics · 2025Article
- Unsupervised clustering of pre-ictal EEG in children: a reproducible and lightweight CPU-based workflow.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Wearable electroencephalography (EEG) enables brain monitoring in real-world environments beyond clinical settings; however, the relaxed constraints of the acquisition setup often compromise signal quality. This review examines methods for artifact detection and for the identification of artifact categories (e.g., ocular) and specific sources (e.g., eye blink) in wearable EEG. A systematic search was conducted across six databases using the query: ("electroencephalographic" OR "electroencephalography" OR "EEG") AND ("Artifact detection" OR "Artifact identification" OR "Artifact removal" OR "Artifact rejection") AND "wearable". Following PRISMA guidelines, 58 studies were included. Artifacts in wearable EEG exhibit specific features due to dry electrodes, reduced scalp coverage, and subject mobility, yet only a few studies explicitly address these peculiarities. Most pipelines integrate detection and removal phases but rarely separate their impact on performance metrics, mainly accuracy (71%) when the clean signal is the reference and selectivity (63%), assessed with respect to physiological signal. Wavelet transforms and ICA, often using thresholding as a decision rule, are among the most frequently used techniques for managing ocular and muscular artifacts. ASR-based pipelines are widely applied for ocular, movement, and instrumental artifacts. Deep learning approaches are emerging, especially for muscular and motion artifacts, with promising applications in real-time settings. Auxiliary sensors (e.g., IMUs) are still underutilized despite their potential in enhancing artifact detection under ecological conditions. Only two studies addressed artifact category identification. A mapping of validated pipelines per artifact type and a survey of public datasets are provided to support benchmarking and reproducibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.