ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Video-Based Automated Lameness Detection for Dairy Cows.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hooves, Sensors, and Signals: Precision Approaches to Automated Lameness Detection in Dairy Cattle.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Review
- Design Considerations, Field Validation and Perspectives of a Low-Power Wearable Sensor Collar for Continuous Monitoring of Ruminants.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- EDC-YOLO-World-DB: A Model for Dairy Cow ROI Detection and Temperature Extraction Under Complex Conditions.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nowadays, the treatment costs associated with lameness rank second among common diseases of cattle. The standard method for detecting lameness is visual observation of the herd by the farmer. However, these methods are time-consuming and labor-intensive and, due to the qualitative nature of the assessment, involve many discrepancies between different human assessors. This study aims to develop fully automated end-to-end methods for the video-based assessment of lameness in dairy cows using data science. For the study, 832 cows with varying degrees of lameness were recorded. The video recordings were then divided into individual frames, where deep learning detected a single cow and its characteristic anatomical points. A custom 7-point locomotion scoring system, inspired by the commonly used 5-level Sprecher (Zinpro) scale, was introduced and evaluated. This scale was used to assess lameness severity based on processed data, which were analyzed using an expert system, machine-learning methods, and a deep-learning approach. Our solution is based on the analysis of the spine curvature, head position, and distance between pairs of legs. The accuracy of detecting binary lameness (healthy vs. lame) through multiple locomotion features approaches expert-level performance, at 0.821 and 0.872, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.