ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Study on the Ground-Penetrating Radar Response Characteristics of Pavement Voids Based on a Three-Phase Concrete Model.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reproducibility-Based Field Validation of Complementary Subsurface Sensing Using a Quantum Diamond Magnetometer and Multi-Frequency Ground-Penetrating Radar.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Concrete pavements frequently develop subsurface voids between surface and base layers during long-term service due to cyclic loading, environmental effects, and subgrade instability, which compromise structural integrity and traffic safety. Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) has been widely used as a non-destructive method for detecting such voids. However, the presence of coarse aggregates with strong electromagnetic scattering properties often introduces pseudo-reflection signals in radar images, hindering accurate void identification. To address this challenge, this study develops a high-fidelity three-phase concrete model incorporating aggregates, mortar, and the interfacial transition zone (ITZ). The Finite-Difference Time-Domain (FDTD) method is used to simulate electromagnetic wave propagation in both voided and intact structures. Simulation results reveal that aggregate-induced scattering can blur or distort reflection interfaces, generating pseudo-hyperbolic anomalies even in the absence of voids. In cases of thin-layer voids, real echo signals may be masked by aggregate scattering, leading to missed detections. GPR systems can be broadly classified into impulse, continuous-wave, and multi-frequency types. To validate the simulations, field tests using multi-frequency 2D/3D GPR systems and borehole verification were conducted. The results confirm the consistency between simulated and actual radar anomalies and validate the proposed model. This work provides theoretical insight and modeling strategies to enhance the interpretation accuracy of GPR data for subsurface void detection in concrete pavements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.