ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Automated Remote Detection of Falls Using Direct Reconstruction of Optical Flow Principal Motion Parameters.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Detecting and alerting for falls is a crucial component of both healthcare and assistive technologies. Wearable devices are vulnerable to damage and require regular inspection and maintenance. Manned video surveillance avoids these problems, but it involves constant labor-intensive attention and, in most cases, may interfere with the privacy of the observed individuals. To address this issue, in this work we introduce and evaluate a novel approach for fully automated fall detection. The presented technique uses direct reconstruction of principal motion parameters, avoiding the computationally expensive full optical flow reconstruction and still providing relevant descriptors for accurate detections. Our method is systematically compared with state-of-the-art techniques. Comparisons of detection accuracy, computational efficiency, and suitability for real-time applications are presented. Experimental results demonstrate notable improvements in accuracy while maintaining a lower computational cost compared to traditional methods, making our approach highly adaptable for real-world deployment. The findings highlight the robustness and universality of our model, suggesting its potential for integration into broader surveillance technologies. Future directions for development will include optimization for resource-constrained environments and deep learning enhancements to refine detection precision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.