ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Research on Multi-Sensor Fusion Localization for Forklift AGV Based on Adaptive Weight Extended Kalman Filter.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study addresses the problem localization deviation caused by cumulative wheel odometry errors in Automated Guided Vehicles (AGVs) operating in complex environments by proposing an adaptive localization method based on multi-sensor fusion. Within an Extended Kalman Filter (EKF) framework, the proposed approach integrates internal sensor predictions with external positioning data corrections, employing an adaptive weighting algorithm to dynamically adjust the contributions of different sensors. This effectively suppresses errors induced by factors such as ground friction and uneven terrain. The experimental results demonstrate that the method achieves a localization accuracy of 13 mm, and the simulation results show a higher accuracy of 10 mm under idealized conditions. The minor discrepancy is attributed to unmodeled noise and systematic errors in the complex real-world environment, thus validating the robustness of the proposed approach while maintaining robustness against challenges such as Non-Line-of-Sight (NLOS) obstructions and low-light conditions. The synergistic combination of LiDAR and odometry not only ensures data accuracy but also enhances system stability, providing a reliable navigation solution for AGVs in industrial settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.