ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Integrating UAV-Derived Diameter Estimations and Machine Learning for Precision Cabbage Yield Mapping.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Non-destructive diameter estimation of cabbage heads and yield prediction employing Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) imagery are superior to conventional approaches, which are labor intensive and time consuming. This approach assesses spatial variability across the field, effective allocation of resources, and supports variable application rates of fertilizer and supply chain management. Here, individual cabbage head diameters were estimated using deep learning-based pose estimation models (YOLOv8s-pose and YOLOv11s-pose) using high spatial resolution RGB images acquired from UAV 6 m during the cabbage-growing season in 2024. With a mean relative error (MRE) of 4.6% and a high mean average precision (mAP) 98.5% at 0.5, YOLOv11s-pose emerged as the best-performing model, verifying its accuracy for pragmatic agricultural use. The approximated diameter was then combined with climatic variables (temperature and rainfall) and canopy reflectance indices (normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), normalized difference red edge index (NDRE), and green chlorophyll index (CIg)) that were extracted from the multispectral images with 6 m resolution and fed into AI models to develop individual cabbage head fresh weight. Among the machine learning models (MLMs) tested, CatBoost achieved the lowest Mean Squared Error (MSE = 0.025 kg/cabbage), highest R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.