ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Center of Pressure Analysis of Postural Stability During Repetitive Reaching with Passive Arm-Support Exoskeletons.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comprehensive Evaluation of a Passive Upper-Limb Exoskeleton in Agricultural Tasks: Integrating Physiological, Postural, and Cognitive Measures.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study assessed the effects of passive arm-support exoskeletons (ASEs) on postural stability during repetitive arm-reaching tasks. In a 3 × 3 × 2 within-subject design, twenty-four healthy right-handed men completed left-, front-, and right-facing arm-reaching tasks at two working distances (65.5 and 68.9 cm) under three intervention conditions (Without, VEX, Airframe). Postural stability was assessed using center of pressure (CoP) data recorded from a force plate. Both ASEs clearly reduced the mean amplitude of CoP in the mediolateral (ML) direction (i.e., the absolute value of MEAN ML and ML APDF10), although neither yielded improvements in anteroposterior (AP) stability. Task direction significantly influenced all CoP measures: left-facing tasks produced the greatest leftward bias, whereas front-facing tasks yielded the smallest AP CoP amplitude. Increasing the working distance by <4 cm modestly heightened AP bias, as reflected in larger AP bias metrics (i.e., MEAN AP, ML APDF50, and ML APDF90). Overall, passive ASEs selectively enhanced lateral postural control, while their effect on AP stability was negligible or even slightly adverse. These findings indicate that the practical utility of passive ASEs depends on the directional demands of specific occupational tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.