ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Guidance for Interactive Visual Analysis in Multivariate Time Series Preprocessing.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multivariate time series analysis presents significant challenges due to its dynamism, heterogeneity, and scalability. Given this, preprocessing is considered a crucial step to ensure analytical quality. However, this phase falls solely on the user without system support, resulting in wasted time, subjective decision-making, and cognitive overload, and is prone to errors that affect the quality of the results. This situation reflects the lack of interactive visual analysis approaches that effectively integrate preprocessing with guidance mechanisms. The main objective of this work was to design and develop a guidance system for interactive visual analysis in multivariate time series preprocessing, allowing users to understand, evaluate, and adapt their decisions in this critical phase of the analytical workflow. To this end, we propose a new guide-based approach that incorporates recommendations, explainability, and interactive visualization. This approach is embodied in the GUIAVisWeb tool, which organizes a workflow through tasks, subtasks, and preprocessing algorithms; recommends appropriate components through consensus validation and predictive evaluation; and explains the justification for each recommendation through visual representations. The proposal was evaluated in two dimensions: (i) quality of the guidance, with an average score of 6.19 on the Likert scale (1-7), and (ii) explainability of the algorithm recommendations, with an average score of 5.56 on the Likert scale (1-6). In addition, a case study was developed with air quality data that demonstrated the functionality of the tool and its ability to support more informed, transparent, and effective preprocessing decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.