Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41012829›Full record

ArticleVeterinary sciences2025

Current Perspectives and Practices of Pet Owners in Türkiye on Animal Care, Nutrition, and Welfare.

Salih Çelik, Habip Muruz, Seda Çelik, Mehmet Ferit Can, Mehmet Çelik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Salih ÇelikTokat Provincial Directorate of Agriculture and Forestry, Tokat 60100, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-9784-5469
Habip MuruzDepartment of Animal Nutrition and Nutritional Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun 55139, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-1975-4545
Seda ÇelikTokat Provincial Directorate of Agriculture and Forestry, Tokat 60100, Türkiye.
Mehmet Ferit CanFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Animal Healht Economics and Management, Hatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversity, Serinyol 31000, Türkiye.
Mehmet ÇelikTokat Provincial Directorate of Agriculture and Forestry, Tokat 60100, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-5924-7671

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although pet ownership is rapidly increasing in developing countries like Turkey, information on how animals are cared for and fed and on perceived animal welfare remains limited. To address this gap, a survey was conducted with 410 participants from 65 provinces, representing over 80% of the country. The study collected data on pet owner demographics, care and feeding practices, and awareness of animal welfare. The results show that most participants (80.6%) have at least a bachelor's degree, and most pets (80.9%) were acquired within the last 10 years. Monthly spending on pet care typically ranges from USD 30 to 90. Ingredient quality emerged as the primary factor driving food choices (51%), driven by a growing interest in premium and super-premium products aimed at improving health and well-being. Veterinary clinics play a significant role in shaping feeding decisions. Most pet owners consider their pets family members and feel quite knowledgeable about their welfare and nutrition. The results suggest that recent trends in human nutrition, such as increasing interest in functional foods and higher ingredient standards, are also shaping pet feeding practices, and that closer collaboration between veterinarians and the pet food industry is needed.

Indexed as

feeding practicespet care practicespet health and welfare trendspet nutritionpet welfare

Identifiers

PMID41012829
PMCPMC12474501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.