ArticleViruses2025
Deep Learning-Based Automatic Segmentation and Analysis of Mitochondrial Damage by Zika Virus and SARS-CoV-2.
Article in Viruses, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Viruses can induce various mitochondrial morphological changes, which are associated with the type of immune response. Therefore, characterization and analysis of mitochondrial ultrastructural changes could provide insights into the kind of immune response elicited, especially when compared to uninfected cells. However, this analysis is highly time-consuming and susceptible to observer bias. This work presents the development of a deep learning-based approach for the automatic identification, segmentation, and analysis of mitochondria from thin-section transmission electron microscopy images of cells infected with two SARS-CoV-2 variants or the Zika virus, utilizing a convolutional neural network with a U-Net architecture. A comparison between manual and automatic segmentations, along with morphological metrics, was performed, yielding an accuracy greater than 85% with no statistically significant differences between the manual and automatic metrics. This approach significantly reduces processing time and enables a prediction of the immune response to viral infections by allowing the detection of both intact and damaged mitochondria. Therefore, the proposed deep learning-based tool may represent a significant advancement in the study and understanding of cellular responses to emerging pathogens. Additionally, its applicability could be extended to the analysis of other organelles, thereby opening up new opportunities for automated studies in cell biology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.