SynthesisViruses2025
Network Meta-Analytical Investigations of the Performance of HIV Combination Prevention Strategies for Indigenous Populations.
Synthesis in Viruses, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIndigenous populations worldwide face a disproportionate burden of HIV due to structural inequities, cultural marginalization, and limited access to health services. Despite growing recognition of the need for culturally adapted responses, the effectiveness of combination HIV prevention strategies in these communities remains underexplored.
objectivesThis study aimed to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of multiple HIV prevention strategies among Indigenous populations using a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA), to inform equity-oriented public health interventions.
methodsFollowing PRISMA-NMA 2020 guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was conducted across four databases (PubMed, SciELO, LILACS, Science Direct) for quantitative studies published between January 2000 and June 2025. Eligible studies evaluated HIV prevention interventions among Indigenous populations and reported risk or odds ratios. A frequentist NMA model was used to calculate effect estimates (OR, 95% CI) and SUCRA rankings for seven types of interventions, combining biomedical, behavioral, and structural approaches.
resultsFour high-to-moderate quality studies enclosing 4523 participants were included. The most effective intervention was home-based counseling and testing for HIV, followed by medical consultation combined with HIV testing. Standalone testing, while effective, was significantly less impactful than when combined with culturally sensitive educational strategies. Information-only strategies showed the least efficacy. The SUCRA analysis ranked home-based testing highest (45.17%), highlighting the importance of decentralization, community participation, and intercultural mediation.
conclusionsCulturally adapted combination prevention strategies-especially those integrating home-based testing and counseling-are more effective than isolated biomedical interventions in Indigenous populations. These findings reinforce the urgent need for participatory, context-driven public health responses that center Indigenous knowledge, reduce stigma, and expand equitable access to HIV care and prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.