Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41012663›Full record

ArticleViruses2025

Tick-Borne Encephalitis Serological Survey of Students from University of Liège.

Claude Saegerman, Constance Wielick, Gilles Darcis, Nicole Maréchal, Fabrice Bureau, Laurent Gillet, Anne-Françoise Donneau, Kevin K Ariën, Marjan Van Esbroeck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Viruses, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Claude SaegermanResearch Unit of Epidemiology and Risk Analysis Applied to Veterinary Science (UREAR-ULg), Fundamental and Applied Research for Animals & Health (FARAH) Center, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium.
Constance WielickResearch Unit of Epidemiology and Risk Analysis Applied to Veterinary Science (UREAR-ULg), Fundamental and Applied Research for Animals & Health (FARAH) Center, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-4524-4303
Gilles DarcisInfectious Diseases Department, Liège University Hospital, 4000 Liège, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-8192-1351
Nicole MaréchalInfectious Diseases Department, Liège University Hospital, 4000 Liège, Belgium.
Fabrice BureauLaboratory of Cellular and Molecular Immunology, GIGA Institute, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-6264-4029
Laurent GilletLaboratory of Immunology-Vaccinology, FARAH, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-1047-2525
Anne-Françoise DonneauResearch Unit Public Health: From Biostatistics to Health Promotion, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium.
Kevin K AriënDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-1340-4165
Marjan Van EsbroeckNational Reference Center for Arboviruses, Department of Clinical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-7294-6319

Funding

University of Liege FSR 2022 - ZooVet
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundZoonotic risks in exposed students are poorly documented in Belgium. According to the literature, even though human tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) infection risk has increased significantly in southern Belgium, no previous human serological survey has demonstrated specific antibodies directed at TBE virus. METHODS AND PRINCIPAL

findingsThe aim of this paper was to perform a representative serological survey on sera involving students at the University of Liege, in the southern part of Belgium, to discover possible exposure to TBEV. A total of 207 sera samples were randomly chosen and analyzed using ELISA IgM (with 1 positive student out of 207) and ELISA IgG (with 10 positive students out of 207), subsequent serial immunofluorescence antibody testing (IFAT) IgG (with 8 positive students out of 10 positive in ELISA IgG) and serial IFAT IgM (with 1 negative student out of 1 positive in ELISA IgM), and confirmatory tests, i.e., 50% and 90% plaque reduction neutralization tests (PRNTs) (1 strongly positive student out of 8 positive in IFAT). CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE: The exposure of students from the southern part of Belgium (area with increasing risk) to TBEV was assessed for the first time. Antibodies against TBEV could only be demonstrated in 1 out of 207 students. This finding contributes to better decision-making in public health and prevention and management of tick-borne diseases in the context of climate change. Awareness among all students should be prioritized, with prevention measures against tick bites, particularly during forest and recreational activities contributing to risk, to maintain the current low seroprevalence levels.

Indexed as

Antibodies, ViralEncephalitis, Tick-BorneEncephalitis Viruses, Tick-BorneStudentsAdolescentAdultBelgiumEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MMaleNeutralization TestsSeroepidemiologic StudiesUniversitiesAntibodies, ViralImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MBelgiumemerging diseasehumanticktick-borne diseasetick-borne encephalitis virus

Identifiers

PMID41012663
PMCPMC12474410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.