Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41012646›Full record

ReviewViruses2025

Codon Usage Bias in Human RNA Viruses and Its Impact on Viral Translation, Fitness, and Evolution.

Iván Ventoso

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Viruses, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. tRNAs at the Virus-Host Interface.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. RNA
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Iván VentosoCentro de Biología Molecular Severo Ochoa (CSIC-UAM) and Departamento de Biología Molecular, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Cantoblanco, 28049 Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synonymous codon usage (codon bias) greatly influences not only translation but also mRNA stability. In vertebrates, highly expressed genes preferentially use codons with an optimal tRNA adaptation index (tAI) that mostly end in C or G. Surprisingly, the codon usage of viruses infecting humans often deviates from optimality, showing an enrichment in A/U-ending codons, which are generally associated with slow decoding and reduced mRNA stability. This observation is particularly evident in RNA viruses causing respiratory illnesses in humans. This review analyzes the mutational and selective forces that shape nucleotide composition and codon usage drift in human RNA viruses, as well as their impact on translation, viral fitness, and evolution. It also describes how some viruses overcome suboptimal codon usage to outcompete host mRNA for translation. Finally, the roles of viral tropism and host adaptation in codon usage bias of prototypical viruses are discussed.

Indexed as

Codon UsageEvolution, MolecularGenetic FitnessProtein BiosynthesisRNA VirusesAnimalsCodonHost AdaptationHumansMutationRNA StabilityCodoncodon usage biashuman RNA virussynonymous codonstranslationtRNAsvirus evolutionvirus fitness

Identifiers

PMID41012646
PMCPMC12474380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.