Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41012584›Full record

ArticleViruses2025

Comparative Evaluation of Modified Vaccinia Ankara as a Surrogate Virus for Disinfectant Efficacy Testing Against AIV, FMDV, and ASFV.

Sok Song, Su-Jeong Kim, Kyu-Sik Shin, So-Hee Park, Yong Yi Joo, Bokhee Han, Cho-Yeon Lee, Gong-Woo Park, Hyun-Ok Ku, Wooseog Jeong and 1 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Viruses, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sok SongVeterinary Drugs & Biologics Division, Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency, Gimcheon 39660, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0009-0001-0904-3192
Su-Jeong KimVeterinary Drugs & Biologics Division, Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency, Gimcheon 39660, Republic of Korea.
Kyu-Sik ShinVeterinary Drugs & Biologics Division, Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency, Gimcheon 39660, Republic of Korea.
So-Hee ParkVeterinary Drugs & Biologics Division, Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency, Gimcheon 39660, Republic of Korea.
Yong Yi JooVeterinary Drugs & Biologics Division, Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency, Gimcheon 39660, Republic of Korea.
Bokhee HanVeterinary Drugs & Biologics Division, Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency, Gimcheon 39660, Republic of Korea.
Cho-Yeon LeeVeterinary Drugs & Biologics Division, Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency, Gimcheon 39660, Republic of Korea.
Gong-Woo ParkVeterinary Drugs & Biologics Division, Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency, Gimcheon 39660, Republic of Korea.
Hyun-Ok KuVeterinary Drugs & Biologics Division, Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency, Gimcheon 39660, Republic of Korea.
Wooseog JeongVeterinary Drugs & Biologics Division, Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency, Gimcheon 39660, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3214-9323
Choi-Kyu ParkInstitute for Veterinary Biomedical Science, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0784-9061

Funding

Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency B-1543073-2023-26-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surrogate viruses provide a safe and scalable alternative for evaluating disinfectant efficacy when access to high-risk pathogens is restricted. This study evaluated the potential of Modified Vaccinia Ankara (MVA) virus, which can be handled under BSL-1/2 conditions, as a surrogate for avian influenza virus (AIV), foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV), and African swine fever virus (ASFV). A total of 64 commercially available disinfectants-classified into four major chemical groups: quaternary ammonium compounds, oxidizing agents, PPMS-based formulations, and organic acids-were tested in suspension assays using a ≥4 log reduction as the efficacy criterion. MVA showed the strongest predictive performance for FMDV (r = 0.671, AUC = 0.83), supporting its use for both binary classification and approximate quantitative prediction. Although its correlation with ASFV was weaker (r = 0.175), the classification performance remained moderate (AUC = 0.78), indicating conditional applicability. While MVA exhibited no meaningful correlation with AIV, its higher chemical resistance meant that disinfectants effective against MVA were consistently effective against AIV. These results support the use of MVA as a conservative exclusion tool for fragile viruses. Overall, the findings demonstrate that MVA can serve as a practical surrogate virus for disinfectant efficacy testing against FMDV, ASFV, and AIV, with application strategies tailored to each virus's characteristics.

Indexed as

African Swine Fever VirusDisinfectantsFoot-and-Mouth Disease VirusInfluenza A virusVaccinia virusAnimalsDisinfectantsAIVASFVFMDVMVAsurrogate virusvirucidal efficacy testing

Identifiers

PMID41012584
PMCPMC12474217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.