ArticleViruses2025
Comparative Evaluation of Modified Vaccinia Ankara as a Surrogate Virus for Disinfectant Efficacy Testing Against AIV, FMDV, and ASFV.
Article in Viruses, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Surrogate viruses provide a safe and scalable alternative for evaluating disinfectant efficacy when access to high-risk pathogens is restricted. This study evaluated the potential of Modified Vaccinia Ankara (MVA) virus, which can be handled under BSL-1/2 conditions, as a surrogate for avian influenza virus (AIV), foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV), and African swine fever virus (ASFV). A total of 64 commercially available disinfectants-classified into four major chemical groups: quaternary ammonium compounds, oxidizing agents, PPMS-based formulations, and organic acids-were tested in suspension assays using a ≥4 log reduction as the efficacy criterion. MVA showed the strongest predictive performance for FMDV (r = 0.671, AUC = 0.83), supporting its use for both binary classification and approximate quantitative prediction. Although its correlation with ASFV was weaker (r = 0.175), the classification performance remained moderate (AUC = 0.78), indicating conditional applicability. While MVA exhibited no meaningful correlation with AIV, its higher chemical resistance meant that disinfectants effective against MVA were consistently effective against AIV. These results support the use of MVA as a conservative exclusion tool for fragile viruses. Overall, the findings demonstrate that MVA can serve as a practical surrogate virus for disinfectant efficacy testing against FMDV, ASFV, and AIV, with application strategies tailored to each virus's characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.