ReviewPharmaceutics2025
Strategic Objectives of Nanotechnology-Driven Repurposing in Radiopharmacy-Implications for Radiopharmaceutical Repurposing (Beyond Oncology).
Review in Pharmaceutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Combinatorial cancer therapy mediated by hydroxyapatite nanoparticles: a comprehensive review.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2026Review
- From Laboratory to Patient Access: A Scoping Review of the Multi-Dimensional Challenges in Drug Repurposing.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Theranostic Nanoprobes for Rheumatoid Arthritis: From Inflammation Visualization to Guided Precision Therapy.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The integration of nanotechnology into drug repurposing strategies is redefining the development landscape for diagnostic, therapeutic, and theranostic agents. In radiopharmacy, nanoplatforms are increasingly being explored to enhance or extend the use of existing radiopharmaceuticals, complementing earlier applications in other biomedical fields. Many of these nanoplatforms evolve into multifunctional systems by incorporating additional imaging modalities (e.g., MRI, fluorescence) or non-radioactive therapies (e.g., photodynamic therapy, chemotherapy). These hybrid constructs often emerge from the reformulation, repositioning, or revival of previously approved or abandoned compounds, generating entities with novel pharmacological, pharmacokinetic, and biodistribution profiles. However, their translational potential faces significant regulatory hurdles. Existing frameworks-typically designed for single-modality drugs or devices-struggle to accommodate the combined complexity of nanoengineering, radioactive components, and integrated functionalities. This review examines how these systems challenge current norms in classification, safety assessment, preclinical modeling, and regulatory coordination. It also addresses emerging concerns around digital adjuncts such as AI-assisted dosimetry and software-based therapy planning. Finally, the article outlines international initiatives aimed at closing regulatory gaps and provides future directions for building harmonized, risk-adapted frameworks that support innovation while ensuring safety and efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.