Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41012456›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutics2025

Explainable Artificial Intelligence: A Perspective on Drug Discovery.

Yazdan Ahmad Qadri, Sibhghatulla Shaikh, Khurshid Ahmad, Inho Choi, Sung Won Kim, Athansios V Vasilakos

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Artificial intelligence-assisted lead optimization in drug discovery: bridging computational advances and translational challenges.Medicinal chemistry research : an international journal for rapid communications on design and mechanisms of action of biologically active agents · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. AI/ML-based computational models for toxicity prediction.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yazdan Ahmad QadriSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan-si 38541, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5708-1532
Sibhghatulla ShaikhDepartment of Medical Biotechnology, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan-si 38541, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-7489-2393
Khurshid AhmadDepartment of Health Informatics, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Qassim University, Buraydah 51452, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-1095-8445
Inho ChoiDepartment of Medical Biotechnology, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan-si 38541, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0884-5994
Sung Won KimSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan-si 38541, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8454-6980
Athansios V VasilakosDepartment of Information and Communication Technology, University of Agder, 4879 Grimstad, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-1902-9877

Funding

Norwegian Research Council SecureIoT
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The convergence of artificial intelligence (AI) and drug discovery is accelerating the pace of therapeutic target identification, refining of drug candidates, and streamlining processes from laboratory research to clinical applications. Despite these promising advances, the inherent opacity of AI-driven models, especially deep-learning (DL) models, poses a significant "black-box" problem, limiting interpretability and acceptance within the pharmaceutical researchers. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) has emerged as a crucial solution for enhancing transparency, trust, and reliability by clarifying the decision-making mechanisms that underpin AI predictions. This review systematically investigates the principles and methodologies underpinning XAI, highlighting various XAI tools, models, and frameworks explicitly designed for drug-discovery tasks. XAI applications in healthcare are explored with an in-depth discussion on the potential role in accelerating the drug-discovery processes, such as molecular modeling, therapeutic target identification, Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, and Excretion (ADME) prediction, clinical trial design, personalized medicine, and molecular property prediction. Furthermore, this article critically examines how XAI approaches effectively address the black-box nature of AI models, bridging the gap between computational predictions and practical pharmaceutical applications. Finally, we discuss the challenges in deploying XAI methodologies, focusing on critical research directions to improve transparency and interpretability in AI-driven drug discovery. This review emphasizes the importance of researchers staying current on evolving XAI technologies to realize their transformative potential in fully improving the efficiency, reliability, and clinical impact of drug-discovery pipelines.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedrug discoveryexplainable artificial intelligencemolecular modelingpersonalized medicinetherapeutic innovation

Identifiers

PMID41012456
PMCPMC12472777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.