ReviewToxics2025
Review of Health Hazards in High-Entropy Alloy Processing Under Laboratory Conditions and Risk Assessment Using a Simple Risk Scoring Model.
Review in Toxics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Cobalt-Free Multi-Principal Elements Alloy with Balanced Mechanical Properties and Exceptional Corrosion Resistance.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- High-Entropy Alloys Produced by Mechanical Alloying: A Review.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Certain metal powders used in the synthesis and processing of high-entropy alloys (HEAs) pose significant health hazards, as many of these metals are toxic substances with no biological role in the human body. These metals can mimic essential elements or interfere with metabolic processes (the chemical reactions in living organisms that sustain life), leading to detrimental health effects. While some metals, such as aluminum, can be eliminated from the body through natural biological processes, others tend to accumulate, causing chronic illnesses over time. This review examines the toxicity mechanisms and health impacts of metals used in HEA synthesis, focusing on laboratory-scale processing. It also identifies potential health risks associated with occupational exposure in laboratory environments, including the inhalation of toxic metal powders and nanoparticles. A simple risk scoring model is introduced to systematically assess and quantify these risks based on factors such as toxicity levels, exposure limits, and carcinogenic potential (the ability of a substance to cause cancer) as given by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) standards. The proposed model can be applied to evaluate the relative hazards of commonly used HEA constituent powders (e.g., Ni, Co, Cr, and Al), offering practical guidance for safer laboratory handling and material selection. By integrating this risk assessment framework, this review aims to enhance workplace safety, guide the development of better material handling practices, and assist researchers in mitigating health risks associated with HEA processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.