Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41012379›Full record

ArticleToxics2025

Implications of Nutrient Fate and Transport Following Nanopesticide Applications in Agricultural Field Plots in Central Kentucky.

William Rud, Manuel D Montaño, Daniel N Miller, Wayne Sanderson, Carmen Agouridis, Brianna F Benner, Tiffany L Messer

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Toxics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

William RudBiosystems and Agricultural Engineering Department, University of Kentucky, 128 Barnhart, Lexington, KY 40506, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7066-1635
Manuel D MontañoDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA 98225, USA.
Daniel N MillerUnited States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3476-487X
Wayne SandersonBiosystems and Agricultural Engineering Department, University of Kentucky, 128 Barnhart, Lexington, KY 40506, USA.
Carmen AgouridisBiosystems and Agricultural Engineering Department, University of Kentucky, 128 Barnhart, Lexington, KY 40506, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9580-6143
Brianna F BennerDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA 98225, USA.ORCID 0009-0005-5491-5710
Tiffany L MesserBiosystems and Agricultural Engineering Department, University of Kentucky, 128 Barnhart, Lexington, KY 40506, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7772-9842

Funding

NIOSH CDC HHS U54 OH007547Southeast Center for Agricultural Health and Injury Prevention Grant 5U54OH007547USDA-NIFA 1025426U.S. Hatch multistate capacity funding grant W-4045
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The potential benefits of nanopesticide use over standard pesticides include more precise application at reduced application rates, lower premature degradation, and decreased direct impacts to target organisms. However, field scale investigations of the fate and transport of common nanopesticides such as copper (II) hydroxide and imidacloprid combinations, remain limited. A field study evaluating nano-scale copper (II) hydroxide (Cu), standard imidacloprid (I), nanoimidicloprid (NI), and nano-scale copper (II) hydroxide and imidacloprid (CuNI) compared to control (C) plots was conducted using thirty 14.6 m

Indexed as

agricultureagroecosystemscopper hydroxideemerging contaminantsnanopesticidesnutrientsrunoff

Identifiers

PMID41012379
PMCPMC12474015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.