ReviewToxics2025
Toxicological, Chemical, Social, and Economic Challenges Associated with PFAS and Replacement Aqueous Film-Forming Foams (AFFF).
Review in Toxics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dietary and social predictors of PFAS exposure in Hispanic children from Northern Virginia.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Poly- and perfluorinated alkyl substances (PFAS) are a group of chemicals that are widely used, prevalent in the environment, associated with several toxic effects, and often have long half-lives. Their persistence and relevant toxicity are the primary causes of environmental and human health concerns, and they are referred to as "forever chemicals" because of their persistence. Environmental accumulation caused by slow natural biodegradation and subsequent long environmental half-lives leads to bioaccumulation and makes PFAS more likely to be chronically toxic with potential transgenerational effects. Ultimately, it is this persistence that causes the greatest concern because PFAS-contaminated sites need costly remediation techniques, or else the contaminated areas will not be available for proper economic development because of social and economic suppression. Non-PFAS, alternative Aqueous Film Forming Foams (AFFF) that are considered environmentally friendly, are being heavily considered or currently used for fire suppression instead of PFAS-based products. The bioaccumulation and toxicity of alternative AFFF are just starting to be studied. The purpose of this review is to discuss the basic environmental and human health effects of PFAS and alternative AFFF that propel regulatory changes, increase clean-up costs, reduce economic development, and drive the development of novel alternatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.