Article in Toxics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Yun DengSchool of Environment and Ecology, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China.
Sheng WangSchool of Environment and Ecology, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China.
Lin FuKey Laboratory of Original Agro-Environmental Pollution Prevention and Control, Agro-Environmental Protection Institute of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs (MARA), Tianjin 300191, China.
Weijie XueKey Laboratory of Original Agro-Environmental Pollution Prevention and Control, Agro-Environmental Protection Institute of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs (MARA), Tianjin 300191, China.
Changbo ZhangKey Laboratory of Original Agro-Environmental Pollution Prevention and Control, Agro-Environmental Protection Institute of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs (MARA), Tianjin 300191, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3435-0247
Jiawei DengKey Laboratory of Original Agro-Environmental Pollution Prevention and Control, Agro-Environmental Protection Institute of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs (MARA), Tianjin 300191, China.
Xin LuoKey Laboratory of Original Agro-Environmental Pollution Prevention and Control, Agro-Environmental Protection Institute of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs (MARA), Tianjin 300191, China.
Yuyao LiuKey Laboratory of Original Agro-Environmental Pollution Prevention and Control, Agro-Environmental Protection Institute of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs (MARA), Tianjin 300191, China.ORCID 0009-0000-6179-712X
Danyang ZhaoKey Laboratory of Original Agro-Environmental Pollution Prevention and Control, Agro-Environmental Protection Institute of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs (MARA), Tianjin 300191, China.
Gilles MailhotInstitut de Chimie de Clermont-Ferrand, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Université Clermont Auvergne, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8179-8880
Funding
Natural Science Foundation of China 42207039
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
Against the challenge of extreme lead (Pb) contamination (>15,000 ppm) in industrial polluted soils, where conventional agents fail to disrupt stable Pb-soil complexes-this study extends our prior cadmium (Cd) remediation research to validate amino acid ionic liquids (AAILs) for highly recalcitrant metals. Fifteen AAILs were screened via batch washing, with [Met][NO
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
A Soil Washing Approach to Remediation of Lead-Contaminated Soil with Amino Acid Ionic Liquid [Met][NO · full record | OpenQuestion