ReviewPolymers2025
Application of Polymers in Hydraulic Fracturing Fluids: A Review.
Review in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Low-Polymer High-Temperature Water-Based Fracturing Gel Enabled by a Dual-Ligand Organic Zirconium Crosslinker: An Experimental Study.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Low-Substitution Glycerol Etherification of Guar Gum for Reduced-Residue Fracturing Fluids.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Molecular dynamic simulation study on admissibility of green additives in hydraulic fracturing fluid.Journal of molecular modeling · 2026Article
- Polyacrylamide-Based Polymers for Slickwater Fracturing Fluids: A Review of Molecular Design, Drag Reduction Mechanisms, and Gelation Methods.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Study on the Lost Circulation Mechanism of Polymer-Based Drilling Fluid Systems in Deep Fractured Shale.Polymers · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multistage hydraulic fracturing significantly increased oil and gas production in the past two decades. After drilling, fracturing fluids are pumped into the formation to create fractures that provide pathways to the hydrocarbon. These fluids are usually viscous to provide the mechanical power to frack the formation and carry the proppants, which keep the fractures open. After fracking, the viscous gel should be broken to allow the flowback of the fluid to avoid formation damage. The key player in the fracturing fluid system is the polymer, which is responsible for the fluid viscosity of the system. All other additives are added to improve the polymer's performance under different conditions and reduce formation damage. The formation damage appears as fine migration, residue precipitation, adsorption, and wettability alteration. All of these types are affected by the polymer types and behavior. This paper reviews the polymers used in fracturing treatments, their classifications, preparations, mechanisms, degradation behavior, and interactions with other fracturing fluid additives. It also covers their impact on the formation damage and environmental concerns raised with fracturing treatments, including spills and flaring activities. The paper discussed the cost of the main polymers used in fracturing fluids and suggested practical recommendations to select a robust, cost-effective polymer. By integrating these concepts, the review gives the researcher the necessary knowledge to design and prepare effective fracturing fluids tailored to a wide range of operational scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.