ArticlePolymers2025
Computational and Experimental Optimization of Injection-Molded Compliant Constant-Torque Mechanisms in Polymeric Materials.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this research, we explore the computational and experimental optimization of compliant constant-torque mechanisms (CTMs) fabricated via injection molding using polymeric materials. We investigate how geometric variations influence the torsional strength of CTMs through numerical simulation, experimental validation, and artificial neural network (ANN) modeling. Four different geometries with the same overall dimensions were designed and analyzed to quantify their mechanical performance. The results reveal that the geometric configuration significantly affected the torsional behavior of the CTMs, with circular cross-sections demonstrating superior strength. Moreover, the ANN model exhibited a high prediction accuracy and minimal relative errors, closely aligning with the experimental outcomes. Despite this, discrepancies between our numerical and experimental results suggest that further refinements in material modeling and manufacturing processes are warranted. In this paper, we emphasize the importance of integrating computational (CAE), artificial neural networks (ANNs) and experimental techniques for optimizing polymer-based CTMs. CAE simulations for Model 4 showed a constant-torque section from 23-44 degrees with 0.142 N·m torque, while experimental and ANN results indicated a longer range (20-45/46 degrees) with higher torque values (0.164 N·m). Experimental and ANN predictions for Model 4 showed an approximate 97% similarity. While these findings represent a foundational step, the characteristics of polymer CTMs suggest potential relevance for advancing applications in precision engineering, biomedical devices, and soft robotics, pending further application-specific validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.