ArticlePolymers2025
Evolution of Microstructure and Performance in Polyacrylonitrile Precursor Fibers: A Comparison of Spinning Processes.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The microstructure of polyacrylonitrile (PAN) precursor fibers has a profound influence on the performance of carbon fibers and depends on the spinning processes and processing conditions. This study compared the evolution of the microstructures and performance of PAN fibers between the wet-spinning and dry-jet wet-spinning processes, utilizing scanning electron microscopy, small/wide-angle X-ray scattering, dynamic mechanical analysis, and single-fiber tensile testing. Both spinning processes promoted the oriented alignment of microfibrils and fibrils, improved the crystal arrangement and molecular regularity, and facilitated the transition from a two-phase (crystalline/amorphous) structure to a single-phase structure, thereby gradually improving the fibers' elastic character and mechanical properties. However, wet-spun fibers exhibited inherent defects (skin-core structure and large voids), which caused surface grooves, radial mechanical heterogeneity, and low breaking elongation during post-spinning. In contrast, dry-jet wet-spun fibers initially had a smooth surface and a homogeneous radial structure, which evolved into well-oriented, radially homogeneous structures during post-spinning. Furthermore, the dry-jet wet-spinning process produced greater increases in crystallinity (46%), crystal size (258%), and orientation index (146%) than the wet-spinning process did. The dry-jet wet-spinning process's superiority in forming and optimizing the fiber microstructure gives it greater potential for producing high-quality PAN precursor fibers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.