ReviewVaccines2025
Recent Advancements in Non-Invasive Vaccination Strategies.
Review in Vaccines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preclinical Evaluation of a Microneedle-Delivered Adjuvanted Microparticulate Gonorrhea Vaccine in Non-Human Primates.Vaccines · 2026Article
- Vaccine Adjuvants and Delivery Systems: A Comprehensive Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Microneedle-Assisted Delivery of Biologics: From Large Molecules to Cancer Vaccines.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2026Review
- From Jenner to genomics: the unfolding future of vaccinology.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Not all plasma cells are made equal: well-hidden layers of heterogeneity.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Evaluation of Polymyxin B as a Novel Vaccine Adjuvant and Its Immunological Comparison with FDA-Approved Adjuvants.Vaccines · 2025Article
- Correlations Between Rheology, In Situ Mucosal Retention and In Vivo Immunogenicity Reveal the Potential and Limitations of Mucoadhesive Excipients for Sublingual Vaccine Delivery.Pharmaceutics · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vaccines remain one of the most powerful tools in modern medicine, having revolutionized public health by preventing millions of deaths and controlling the spread of infectious diseases worldwide. However, conventional needle-based vaccines face several limitations, including pain and discomfort, the need for cold-chain infrastructure, reliance on trained healthcare personnel, risk of cross-contamination, and limited accessibility in low-resource settings. These challenges have spurred the development of non-invasive vaccination approaches that promise safer, more accessible, and patient-friendly immunization. Non-invasive immunizations not only eliminate the need for needles but may also enhance compliance and enable mucosal immune responses. To harness the full potential of these innovative delivery routes, a comprehensive understanding of their formulation strategies and mechanism of action is essential. This review aims to comprehensively discuss recent advancements in oral, intranasal, microneedle, buccal, sublingual, and vaginal vaccinations and highlight their underlying immunological mechanisms, formulation strategies in preclinical studies, examples of marketed products, and ongoing clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.