ArticleVaccines2025
Adjuvant Mucosal Strategies Confer Safe and Effective Immunity Against
Article in Vaccines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immunogenicity Evaluation of Six Key Antigens ofVaccines · 2026Article
- Development of human mycoplasma vaccines: navigating the IL-17A paradox.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesThe global spread of
methodsMice were immunized with inactivated vaccines via either intramuscular (IM) injection with aluminum hydroxide (alum) or a combination of CpG+QS21 (CQ) or via intranasal (IN) administration of Flagellin from
resultsBoth IM-vaccinated groups (alum and CQ) exhibited robust systemic immune responses. However, upon subsequent MP challenge, these groups exhibited significant inflammatory pathology in the lung tissues. Notably, the CQ-adjuvanted group displayed severe pulmonary inflammatory infiltration. In stark contrast, compared with the IM-vaccinated group, the IN-immunized group with the FLA-ST mucosal adjuvant achieved significant clearance of MP from the lungs and showed markedly milder histopathological lung damage.
conclusionsOur findings suggest that IM immunization with CQ-adjuvanted inactivated vaccines may represent a suboptimal strategy for MP, given the risk of exacerbating lung immunopathology. Conversely, a mucosal immunization approach using the FLA-ST adjuvant demonstrates considerable promise, offering an effective balance between bacterial clearance and an improved safety profile, highlighting its potential for future MP vaccine development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.