Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41012158›Full record

ReviewVaccines2025

Identification of T-Cell Epitopes and Vaccine Development for African Swine Fever Virus.

Wanyi Ni, Hanchun Yang, Nianzhi Zhang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vaccines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wanyi NiNational Key Laboratory of Veterinary Public Health Security, Key Laboratory of Animal Epidemiology of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Hanchun YangNational Key Laboratory of Veterinary Public Health Security, Key Laboratory of Animal Epidemiology of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3359-3925
Nianzhi ZhangNational Key Laboratory of Veterinary Public Health Security, Key Laboratory of Animal Epidemiology of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2021YFD1800100), the National Natural Science foundation of China (32172871), and the 2115 Talent Development Program of China Agricultural University. (2021YFD1800100); (32172871)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

African swine fever virus (ASFV) has inflicted severe devastation on the global pig industry, yet a globally approved vaccine remains unavailable. Given that cellular immunity is critical for ASFV prevention, the development of vaccines based on T-cell epitopes emerges as a promising strategy to control this virus. This review synthesizes the recent advancements and challenges in the research on ASFV T-cell epitopes, while offering insights into the potential impact of novel T-cell epitope-based vaccines. Notably, only a limited number of ASFV T-cell epitopes have been experimentally identified to date, covering fewer than 20 ASFV proteins. This bottleneck is attributed to challenges such as high swine leukocyte antigen (SLA) polymorphism, suboptimal accuracy of predicting tools, and complex experimental validation procedures. Although current studies on ASFV-specific T-cell immune responses and epitope identification are insufficient to meet vaccine development needs, continuous progress in T-cell immunology research in recent years has brought this goal closer to reality.

Indexed as

ASFVidentification problemsT-cell epitopevaccine

Identifiers

PMID41012158
PMCPMC12474340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.