ArticleVaccines2025
A Novel Carbohydrate Fatty-Acid Monosulphate Ester, Squalane-in-Water Adjuvant Is Safe and Enhances Inactivated Influenza Vaccine Immunogenicity in Older Adults.
Article in Vaccines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Harnessing Nanocarriers to Advance Vaccine Development.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2026Review
- Carbohydrate fatty acid monosulphate ester adjuvant enhances the immunogenicity of influenza antigensFrontiers in immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Influenza vaccines are the primary strategy to prevent severe influenza disease; however, their efficacy is often suboptimal, particularly in older adults (OAs). LiteVax Adjuvant (LVA), a novel adjuvant containing carbohydrate fatty-acid monosulphate ester (CMS) as the active ingredient, has demonstrated a favourable safety profile and enhanced immunogenicity when combined with a low-dose seasonal influenza vaccine in adults aged 18 to 50 years in a first-in-human phase 1 study. The present study investigates the reactogenicity and immunogenicity of CMS-based adjuvanted seasonal influenza vaccine in OAs, with a comparison to responses in younger adults (YAs). In this phase 1b, double-blind, active-controlled clinical trial, 36 YAs (18-50 years) and 48 OAs (≥60 years) were randomized (1:1:1) to receive either 0.5 mg or 1 mg LVA combined with VaxigripTetra, or VaxigripTetra alone. Solicited adverse events (AEs) were recorded using an electronic diary for 7 days following vaccination. Hemagglutination inhibition (HI) titers against four influenza strains were measured at baseline (pre-vaccination) and at 7-, 28-, and 180-days post-vaccination. All 24 YAs and 31 out of 32 OAs receiving CMS-based adjuvanted vaccines reported pain post-vaccination, compared to 8/12 YAs and 4/16 OAs receiving VaxigripTetra. Systemic AEs were more frequently reported among YAs receiving CMS-based adjuvanted vaccines (22/24) compared to those receiving VaxigripTetra (8/12). In OAs, the number of systemic AEs was similar regardless of CMS-based adjuvant administration. Most AEs were mild to moderate and resolved within 3 days. Both CMS-based adjuvanted formulations elicited increased HI titers at Day 7, peaking at Day 28, with a decline thereafter that remained above baseline at Day 180. In YAs, HI titers were comparable between the CMS-based adjuvanted and non-adjuvanted vaccines across all strains and timepoints. In contrast, CMS-based adjuvanted vaccination in OAs induced higher HI titers at Days 28 and 180 for all influenza strains tested. LVA shows an acceptable safety profile in both age cohorts and enhances humoral immune responses in older adults. The 1 mg dose of LVA was more immunogenic, highlighting its potential utility in this target population. Future research will focus on elucidating the mechanisms underlying the immunostimulatory effect of the CMS-based adjuvant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.