Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41012081›Full record

ReviewPlants (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Approaches to Extracting Bioactive Compounds from Bark of Various Plants: A Brief Review.

Adrian Nisca, Corneliu Tanase

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Adrian NiscaDoctoral School of Medicine and Pharmacy, "George Emil Palade" University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences and Technology of Târgu Mures, 38 Gheorghe Marinescu Street, 540139 Târgu Mures, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-0500-4871
Corneliu TanaseDepartment of Pharmaceutical Botany, Faculty of Pharmacy, "George Emil Palade" University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences and Technology of Târgu Mures, 38 Gheorghe Marinescu Street, 540139 Târgu Mures, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-4314-1797

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, focus has been directed toward studying lignocellulosic matter, such as forestry by-products, due to their high therapeutic potential offered by various bioactive compounds, mainly phenolic compounds. To obtain extracts rich in these phytochemicals, suitable extraction methods must be employed, and a thorough understanding of these methods is necessary. This work concentrates on describing both classical and modern extraction techniques, highlighting their mechanisms as well as their key advantages and disadvantages. It was observed that a wide variety of extraction methods are currently used for bark, emphasizing the importance of method optimization to achieve higher yields of phytochemicals valuable for their biological activities.

Indexed as

barkbioactive compoundsextraction methodsgreen methodsphytochemicals

Identifiers

PMID41012081
PMCPMC12473992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.