Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41012015›Full record

ReviewPlants (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Current Status of Studying on Physiological Mechanisms of Rice Response to Flooding Stress and Flooding-Resistant Cultivation Regulation.

Weicheng Bu, Irshad Ahmad, Han Fei, Muhi Eldeen Hussien Ibrahim, Yunji Xu, Tianyao Meng, Qingsong Zuo, Tianjie Lei, Guisheng Zhou, Guanglong Zhu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Weicheng BuJoint International Research Laboratory of Agriculture and Agri-Product Safety, the Ministry of Education of China, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China.
Irshad AhmadJiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology, Agricultural College, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8756-8605
Han FeiJiangsu Co-Innovation Center for Modern Production Technology of Grain Crops, Agricultural College, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China.
Muhi Eldeen Hussien IbrahimFaculty of Agriculture, University of Science and Technology of Sudan, Khartoum 11115, Sudan.ORCID 0000-0002-5915-5272
Yunji XuJoint International Research Laboratory of Agriculture and Agri-Product Safety, the Ministry of Education of China, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China.
Tianyao MengJoint International Research Laboratory of Agriculture and Agri-Product Safety, the Ministry of Education of China, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China.
Qingsong ZuoFaculty of Agriculture, University of Science and Technology of Sudan, Khartoum 11115, Sudan.
Tianjie LeiInstitute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China.
Guisheng ZhouJiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology, Agricultural College, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China.
Guanglong ZhuJoint International Research Laboratory of Agriculture and Agri-Product Safety, the Ministry of Education of China, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9077-0217

Funding

China National Key Research and Development Program 2023YFD2300300Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu province BK20241931Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province SJCX24_2272
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to climate change, flooding stress has occurred more frequently and intensively than ever before, which has become one of the major abiotic stresses affecting rice production. In tropical regions around the world, southeastern coastal countries, and southern rice production areas of China, frequent flooding disaster usually takes place during the rainy season and heavy summer rainfall, which leads to great yield losses in rice production. Currently, only a few rice genotypes are flooding-tolerant, and the relevant flooding-resistant cultivation and regulation practices are still lacking. Therefore, this review highlighted the latest studies on the physiological mechanisms of rice response to flooding stress and flooding-resistant cultivation, particularly summarizing the effect of flooding stress on rice root system architecture, plant growth, reactive oxygen metabolism, energy metabolism, radiation use efficiency, endogenous hormone metabolism, nitrogen utilization efficiency, and yield formation. In addition, the breeding strategies and cultivation regulation approaches for alleviating the flooding stress of rice were analyzed. Finally, future research directions are outlined. This review comprehensively summarizes the rice growth performance and physiological traits response to flooding stress, and sums up some useful regulation strategies, which might assist in further interpreting the mechanisms of plants' response to flooding stress and developing stress-resistant cultivation practices for rice production.

Indexed as

cultivation regulationflooding stressgrain yieldphysiological mechanismsresource use efficiency

Identifiers

PMID41012015
PMCPMC12473436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.